JOURNEY INTO MYSTERY #89: Oh, the Poor Dear…

Published: February, 1963

“The Thunder God and the Thug!”
Plot: Stan Lee
Script: Larry Lieber
Pencils: Jack Kirby
Inks: Dick Ayers
Letters: Ray Holloway

Last time, we talked about Sue Storm, and how some of the fans back in the 1960’s thought she wasn’t contributing enough. Reed and Ben put us straight, and I hope my remarks also helped to dispel any doubts about Sue’s value to the team. We came away from that issue knowing that, even though we are still in the pre-Women’s Lib era of the early 1960’s, Marvel comics believes that a woman CAN be a superhero.

I feel compelled to mention this, because in Journey Into Mystery #89, we find two other women who are not strong female characters like Sue Storm. Before we go on, I want to clarify that I understand when the creators portray these women—Jane Foster, and a guest appearance by Ruby, girlfriend of mobster “Thug”—I never thought they were saying, “Look at how weak and pathetic women are!” Here in JIM #89, they are simply presenting a female archetype that people could relate to. Also, this type of character works well in stories where the melodramatic is so prevalent. After all, every hero needs to have somebody to protect, and who better than a poor dear of a female?

JANE
So yes, a woman can be a superhero, but in this Thor adventure, we see two women acting like…women. That is, like typical women of the 1960’s. First we have Jane Foster. As Dr. Blake’s nurse, we’ve met her before; we know what makes her tick. I’ve surmised she’s a romantic, very much a “girlie girl.” And nothing’s changed in this issue, it’s just…if possible…moreso.

Early in this issue, we rehash the Thor origin story, including the desperate and ironic situation of both Blake and Jane longing for each other, but each afraid to profess their love. Due to this lack of communication, misunderstanding ensues and, believing that Blake is uninterested, Jane turns her attention to Thor instead. We see her daydreaming about how wonderful it would be, if she were part of Thor’s life. Ah, yes! Wonderful, indeed! She would polish Mjornir for him, iron his cape, cut his hair…

Wait! What? Are you kidding me? Is Jane really wasting her daydreaming on perfectly ordinary domestic tasks? Is that the best she can come up with—she wants to “look after him”?

And this is also odd: in her daydream, Jane refers to Thor as her “boss.” I’m not exactly sure what’s going on here. Previously, she’s mentioned that she would like to “work” for Thor; apparently that was not a typo, or a euphemism for something more intimate. She actually wants to work for him.

Listen. Someone has got to teach this girl how to fantasize! Or maybe even explain the facts of life! What are they teaching them in these nursing schools, anyway? I mean, I can think of a lot better things to do with Thor than iron his cape!

And what’s this about cutting his hair? Huh? I see this image, and right away I think of the Biblical tale of Samson, whose strength was in his hair, and when it was cut, he was weakened. I know that’s not what’s going on here, but I can’t help feeling that Jane cutting Thor’s hair is her subconscious desire to emasculate him, make him more “ordinary,” so that she will feel that he is on her level, and will not stray from her.

I’m sure Jane knows that as an ordinary human female she hasn’t got a snowball’s chance in hell with the Thunder God. But you know what? I don’t think she’s actually interested in him as a Thunder God. Obviously, or she wouldn’t want to cut his hair and domesticate him! What I do think is that Jane’s main attraction to Thor is that he’s manly, and gallant, and strong and brave—but more than that, in the past, he’s shown her some attention. That’s all she wants. And she’s not getting it from Blake, so she does a complete 180 and begins to crush on Thor.

A quick thought: They say women like to marry men like their fathers. Since Jane is equally smitten with both Blake and Thor, I have no idea what to expect, if we ever meet her father. Anyone want to hazard a guess?

By the end of this story, Thor has rescued Jane from the bad guys, flying her to safety, and telling her, “Do not be afraid, Jane!” Her reply: “I couldn’t be—with you here!” Also (breathlessly, I’m sure): “Is there nothing you cannot do, Thor?”

Yeah, apparently there is. Apparently he can’t iron his own cape, or polish his own hammer, or… Oh, my…

Something just occurred to me, but this blog is rated PG, so I won’t say it. I’ll just end this discussion by suggesting that perhaps our poor little dear of a nurse is so out of tune with her femininity and sexuality that even her daydreams are as symbolic as her night dreams.

Okay, let’s move on.

RUBY
We have another female character in this story: Ruby, the devoted girlfriend of nogoodnik Thug Thatcher. With their boss injured in a prison break, Thug’s thugs decide to “fetch him a sawbones” (that’s gangster for “doctor”). Blake complies in order to prevent Jane from being harmed, then treats Thug, not because of any threats, but because it’s his duty as a physician.

Still, despite all the kindness shown by the good doctor, Thug decides to “off” Blake anyway (that’s gangster for “kill”), completely ignoring the protests of his girlfriend Ruby.

Thor shows up and there’s a fight and a chase and some trees fall on a car. In the end, even though Thug tells Ruby to “Get lost!” and tries to shoot her, she says, “I still love him! SOB! I can’t help myself!”

That “SOB” should stand for “Son of a Bitch!” but it doesn’t. It’s Ruby crying, because the poor dear is still in love with a gangster who tried to kill her.

This is sad, very sad indeed.

And the saddest part of all? Even though this is only a story in a comic book, there are women like this in real life, back in the 1960’s, and even today—women whose self-esteem has been so mutilated that they set themselves up for abuse and heartache, thinking this is the life they deserve.

Poor Ruby. She has a good heart, she’s just had a tough life. Yes, she’s the gangster’s girlfriend, but she sticks up for Dr. Blake, pleading for his life. She encourages Thug to turn himself in to the police. She wants to do the right thing, but is ultimately defeated by overpowering forces that keep her firmly under the thumb of the louse she loves.

In a nice twist at the end, Thor sees all this, and calls on Odin to wipe her memory clean and make her “free of her tragic love! Free to find one who will be worthy of her!”

Of all the good things Thor has done in the stories I’ve read so far, this is the most impressive. We know Thor is strong in body and mind, but now we also see him strong in heart, caring for others who cannot care for themselves. What a hero!

However, if Odin’s memory wipe only removes the memory of Thug Thatcher, that might not be enough to free Ruby to find the one who will be worthy of her. I’m afraid this woman will need additional help to make her emotionally well. Thug may not have been the cause of her low self-esteem, only the symptom. Perhaps Dr. Blake has a colleague, a psychiatrist, who can pick up where Odin left off?

I don’t know if we’ll see Ruby again, and I don’t know if her life will be happy from this point on. I do know we’ll see Jane Foster, and I’ll bet we get lots more of this secret whining and pining, as she and Blake continue the charade of caring for each other only as co-workers.

Well, not good for Jane and Blake. But good for us. Because, as I mentioned earlier, that’s what melodrama is made of. And as I continue my travels through the Marvelous Zone, along with all this good old-fashioned action and adventure, I do love me some melodrama!

Even with all the melodrama going on in this story, we didn’t actually have a great villain to contemplate. But join us next time when we weave a web of scum and villainy the likes of which we have yet to see in the Marvelous Zone!

Want to read this comic on your computer? Marvel has a scan!
Want to own this story? Buy the Masterworks!
Posted in Thor | Leave a comment

FANTASTIC FOUR #11: Shenanigans!

Published: February, 1963

“A Visit With the Fantastic Four”
Script: Stan Lee
Pencils: Jack Kirby
Inks: Dick Ayers
Letters: Art Simek

“The Impossible Man”
Script: Stan Lee
Pencils: Jack Kirby
Inks: Dick Ayers
Letters: Art Simek

We’ve only had ten issues of The Fantastic Four, but in every one they’ve been so busy fighting super-villains, we haven’t had a chance to get to know our heroes, to find out where they came from and what they like to do in their spare time. On the splash for the first story, Stan says this is “the type of story most requested by your letters and post cards.” In fact, we see one kid excited, because his letter is on the fan page!

Again I marvel at how much the creators took the time and effort not only to pay attention to what their readers wanted, but also to make a point of letting those readers know, “We’re doing this for you.” This had to feel like so much more than a simple comic book to Marvel’s young readers. This had to feel like a cooperative effort. I can’t think of a better way to get your customers to keep coming back than to say to them, “What do you want? Tell me what you want, and we’ll do it. For you.”

After a short sequence where the FF play around with some kids, Mr. Lumpkin the mailman brings the FF a sack of fan mail and they go through it, answering the questions that inquiring minds most want to know.

YANCY STREET GANG
We start with a joke about Thing and the Yancy Street Gang. You know, I don’t think I’ve actually met the Yancy Street Gang yet. I know they are periodically mentioned, solely for entertainment value, as a great source of irritation to Thing. I have no idea exactly what Thing’s beef is with the gang, and I guess it’s not actually that important. All that matters is that, as Thing puts it, “They’re always trying to get my goat!” And whenever they do, we always get a little chuckle out of Thing’s over-reaction.

BEN GRIMM
We have another instance of Reed trying a new formula to change Thing back to Ben Grimm…and it works! They’re all delighted with the results, and if you ask me, Sue is perhaps a little too delighted, hugging Ben with her foot in the air, calling him a “living doll” and moaning, “MMMMM MMM!”

But Reed is standing right there and doesn’t seem to mind…so who am I to complain?

So Thing gets to be Ben Grimm again, hanging about in his blue shorts, and of course, when you are at last restored to human form, what’s the one thing you most want to do? Sit around and rehash the past! Sure! For the next three or four pages we have a plethora of scalloped panels (including a few non-scallops on the bottom of page 7 that should have been scalloped), taking us back to when Reed and Ben meet in college, serve in the armed forces, and going on to a retelling of the origin story. I think this must be the third or fourth time we’re revisiting the origin story. I’m guessing that the FF title must be picking up new readers with each issue, and this re-telling is being repeated in an effort to be sure that everyone is up to speed.

But the conversation is not only about the past. We also stop to review the status of the Reed/Sue relationship. Apparently Sue is still confused by “the shadow of Sub-Mariner” and Reed resolves not to say anything else until she makes her decision, once and for all.

As if this dilemma is not enough to distress the only female member of our crew, Sue reveals that she has an additional heartache, brought on by the very fans who claim to idolize the FF.

It seems there were some fans—and it must have been a good number, if Stan thought it necessary to address the issue—who felt that Sue did not contribute enough, and that the other three would be better off without her. To which I immediately say… what?

HELLO! Haven’t you been paying attention? How many times has Sue saved their butts already? Because of her invisibility, she has tremendous access to areas a visible person could never easily go. Reed reminds the readers of how Sue helped out with the Skrulls, and how she freed the other three from an airless chamber. There are numerous other instances Reed doesn’t mention, probably because space did not permit. After all, they have only thirteen pages to get this story done.

In a nutshell, none of the other three would be alive today, if it weren’t for Sue! When I read this the first time, it flabbergasted me, and when I read it now again, it still flabbergasts me. What were those readers smoking, to even think something like this, never mind take the time to put pencil to paper and pop a ten cent stamp on an envelope? What a waste of paper and stamps!

One possible explanation occurs to me. This is, of course, the 1960’s, and the idea of women as super-heroines was still kind of new, and perhaps being met with some resistance. These allegations against Sue seem to be nothing more than a sexist opposition based totally upon prejudice and not upon fact. The little boys writing these letters wanted to see themselves as heroes, not their mothers and sisters and aunts. So they simply ignored the fact that Sue’s contribution was invaluable and launched a campaign to get her ousted from the FF.

Well, Reed wastes no time in setting these little boys straight. Well, actually, he does waste a bit of time, first going off on a tangent about Abraham Lincoln’s mother which I didn’t actually understand. Sue is neither Abraham Lincoln’s mother, nor anyone’s mother, for that matter. The main point that Reed’s trying to make here is that girls can provide a lot of “behind the scenes” support for the men who are the actual heroes. You know, when I think about it that way, Reed is also being sexist. If he only went that far, with the Abraham Lincoln mumbo-jumbo, I might have a beef with him, but then he lists those examples of Sue actively contributing to their adventures.

Ben gets so angry about the fans reaction to Sue that he yells, “If you readers wanna see women fight all the time, then go see lady wrestlers!” And as he yells, the magic potion evaporates and he changes back to Thing, the “gruesome gorilla.”

But we’re not done with Sue and sexist remarks yet. Suddenly an alarm sounds, and they rush into the flying saucer they kept from their adventures on Planet X and…

DUM DUM DA DUM!!!
A birthday cake! For Sue! Their “Favorite” partner. Sue is so choked up she doesn’t know what to say. And Thing jokes, “First time I ever heard a female admit a thing like that!” Well, okay. It’s mostly a joke, and only a little bit sexist. I can let that one go by.

Then, as they’re all enjoying cake, “Lumpy” the mailman arrives with another overflowing bag of fan mail!

And the Editor’s Note promises that “from time to time in future issues we shall attempt to pictorially comment on other letters from you…our valued fans!”

I look forward to future issues where we can take a break from all the world-saving and villain-bashing and relax at home with the FF. We get to see our heroes more relaxed at home—though, if they really wanted to relax, they should change out of those blue jumpsuits. We also get some additional information we didn’t know before.

Here are 10 Things You Might Not Have Known About the FF Before Issue #11:

  1. Reed has been smoking a pipe at least since college
  2. Ben played football in college—though I’m not sure what position…maybe Running Back?
  3. Reed and Sue lived next door to each other as kids
  4. Reed is a millionaire’s son
  5. Ben was “from the wrong side of the tracks”
  6. Ben served in the Marines during World War II
  7. Reed worked behind the lines, underground, for the OSS
  8. The FF keep a bust of Abraham Lincoln in their HQ
  9. The FF kept the flying saucer from Planet X
  10. Johnny gets fan mail from girls who want to “go steady” with him

And finally, this is probably my favorite panel from this entire story:

Take a moment to look and read, and see how much is going on in this one panel. Kids are mesmerized by the FF. The FF are kind to their fans, and enjoying their celebrity. Well, except for Thing. But that’s so in character. And what’s also in character is this image of the family, side by side, arm in arm, out for a stroll in their Sunday Best.

Ah! If only every moment could be this peaceful and serene for the Fantastic Four! But no! Where would the fun be in that? We would get bored, and so would they. So let’s move on to their next adventure…

But wait! Before we move on, we inexplicably have a “Pin-Up Page” for Prince Namor, the Mighty Submariner! Interestingly, Submariner is one word, not hyphenated, as we’ve seen before. Also, Namor seems to be standing in his underwater apartment, which features television, books, fishing net curtains, a coffee table with seahorses as legs, some sort of dead-looking sea-flora ornamentation, and the “largest pearl in existence—blasted loose by Submariner from a 30 foot clam!” Admittedly, except for the TV and books, you don’t have any of these things in your house. Oh yes! And did I mention the prow of a sunken vessel? It’s all rather chic, actually. Still, I don’t think HGTV is going to be signing up Namor to host a decorating show any time soon.

THE IMPOSSIBLE MAN
But I’m not here to talk about Submariner (or Sub-Mariner), because as soon as we turn the page on the Namor Pin-Up we find that the FF have come back from their short break of answering fan mail and eating birthday cake and are now ready to take on the latest menace to society—the Impossible Man!

It’s a good name, don’t you think? The idea of the “impossible” conjures up all sorts of possibilities. But in fact, the Impossible Man is nothing more than an immature shape-shifter from outer space. With a “Pop!” he can instantly “evolve” into any form that suits his purposes. He knows nothing of earth customs or etiquette, and that contributes to his “Impossible” status as much as his shape-shifting.

The world is exasperated by the antics of the Impossible Man and nobody can figure out how to deal with him, until finally the brilliant brain of scientist Reed Richards comes up with the answer: ignore him. The Impossible Man is an intergalactic child who craves attention. When he doesn’t get it, he becomes frustrated and bored, calls them all a bunch of “Soreheads,” and leaves.

Wow. Could it really be that simple? Yes, it is.

One question remains though: is the Impossible Man really a child, or does he just act like one? And if he is a child, what might happen if he comes back to earth…this time bringing Mom and Pop with him? Would they have that same “I think I’m going to like it here!” attitude as their son initially did? If not, we could be in for some real trouble. Shape-shifting could be a dangerous power if wielded by cunning and conniving aliens.

But for the moment, this tale of the Impossible Man was little more than a diversion with a few moments of fun and imagination. I don’t think people are going to be talking a whole lot about the Impossible Man years into the future. I don’t see Joss Whedon making another Marvel movie any time soon with the Impossible Man as the villain. Well, unless it’s a comedy… or maybe a musical comedy….sort of like Dr. Horrible…

Hmmmm…..

Anyway, the Impossible Man is uncontrollable and unpredictable, but he’s not really evil. He is, at best, a distraction. However, the splash doesn’t treat him as such.

Notice the bold proclamation “At last The Fantastic Four meet a foe whose power is even greater than their own!” I think Stan was being mighty generous to the Impossible Man on this splash. But of course, it’s statements like this that sell comics. Who would buy if we were promised “The FF ignore a spoiled brat from outer space.” Well, I might buy it, if I had twelve cents, because that statement would be so different than all the other statements that come out of “The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” and my curiosity would surely get the best of me.

MASTERWORKS
I read “The Impossible Man” in Marvel Masterworks, Volume 6: The Fantastic Four. I’ve mentioned the Masterworks before. They’re a great place to get your Marvel comics on clean tight pages, in living color. Another advantage of the Masterworks is that Stan Lee provides introductory remarks at the beginning of each volume, and if you thought his writing style was amusing in the comics, then you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

I was going to try to paraphrase what Stan said about his experience in introducing the Impossible Man, but why do that when his own words are so descriptive? Here’s Stan:

Now I’d like to share a little secret with you.

I don’t stumble often, but when I do I really fall flat on my face. Perhaps my biggest tumble had to do with one of the FF’s most offbeat villains, the Impossible Man. Personally, I loved the guy. I thought he was one of my cleverest creations. To the best of my knowledge, there has never been a villain like him.

Well, that’s what I thought. The outraged hordes of Marveldom thought differently, and told me so in no uncertain terms. The mail poured in. The phone calls clogged our switchboard. Everyone swore I had gone off my rocker. In a way, it was a worthwhile experience. It should have taught me humility. It’s a pity that it didn’t! I still like the pinhead from the planet Popup. It’ll be fun to see what you think.

There you have it, folks, in Stan’s own words, a brief look into history. There’s lots more “behind the scenes” kinds of information in these Marvel Masterworks, so if you’re not already familiar with them, I would strongly encourage you to check them out!

As for what I think of the Impossible Man, Stan might be interested to know that I didn’t hate him, like so many of the readers of the day apparently did. He is, indeed, “offbeat,” and that’s fine for a diversion, but I’m interested in getting back to the real villains, in real stories of drama and heroics that show the FF in their best possible light, working together to save the world, despite what might sometimes seem to be nearly impossible odds.

After the Impossible Man goes back to his home planet, Johnny mentions that he’s gone….forever. Well, I don’t know about that. Nobody’s really gone “forever” in the Marvel Universe. We may have to deal with the Impossible Man again, but until then, there are plenty of other stories to capture our imaginations.

Next time, in The Marvelous Zone, we’ll journey into the mysterious workings of the female mind, when the marvelous imaginings of the fantastic are replaced by the mundane fantasies of the domestic. Intrigued? Confused? Stay tuned!

Want to read this comic on your computer? Marvel has a scan!
Want to own this story? Buy the Masterworks!
Posted in Fantastic Four | 6 Comments

MARVELOUS MOVIES: SPIDER-MAN (2002)

With great casting comes…a great movie!

Well, I don’t know that the original Spider-Man is a “great” movie, but it’s a good movie, accomplishing what it sets out to do: it tells the origin story of Spider-Man in an entertaining fashion, while also providing a sufficiently creepy villain for our hero to vanquish.

It’s only been a few months since the 2012 Spider-Man re-boot, so it’s impossible not to draw comparisons. The re-boot was okay, but the question lingers…why? Why did we need a re-boot? It’s only been ten years. Did the creators of the re-boot not have enough confidence in the movie-going public’s ability to remember the Spider-Man origin story after such a short a time?

Or, perhaps…did the makers of the re-boot not have enough faith in their action-adventure story to let it stand on its own? Yes, we all love a good origin story, but…c’mon already! Let’s get on with it!

But I’m really getting off track. I mean to say a word or two about the original Spider-Man, and of course the first word I’ve already said is “great casting”—which is actually two words, but this, along with the strength of the origin story, is what makes this movie still feel fresh, even ten years later.

We start with Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker/Spider-Man, and for me, this works. Tobey Maguire naturally has that nerdy look that absolutely screams Peter Parker. I believed he was a teenager, and I believed he was Peter Parker. For the re-boot, Andrew Garfield was too tall, too old (29) and too good-looking to be Parker. Nowadays, it’s cool to be a nerd. Garfield looks like one of the “cool” nerds—David Copperfield after his “make-over,” not before. But Tobey Maguire looks like an honest to goodness NERD.

Besides which, I had also seen Andrew Garfield on a talk show and discovered he’s actually British, and somehow, I couldn’t get that out of my mind while watching the re-boot. On this talk show, he also mentioned having a “man crush” on some actor, and that was something else I couldn’t get out of my mind, watching him pretend to be Peter Parker. I think maybe sometimes it’s best not to know too much about the actors before you go to see a movie. It kind of eats away at the magic.

But Tobey Maguire’s performance is absolute magic, hitting just the right high notes between the nerdiness of Parker and the cockiness of Spider-Man. His performance is the web that holds it all together.

VILLAINOUS!
Next big casting success is Willem Dafoe as the screw-loose Norman Osborn. There’s something about Dafoe’s look that seems slightly sinister and…not quite right. He’s too sharp and angular almost to be a real person. In some ways, he’s actually scarier as Norman Osborn than he is when he puts on the mask of the Green Goblin. As for the mask, that’s one of few things that just doesn’t work for me. It’s too cartoonish, too much like a costume, and entirely too immobile. The only time the mask works is when you can see Dafoe’s crazy eyes peering out. I get more evil vibes from the menacing stance of Osborne’s body on the glider than from the Green Goblin’s Halloweenish mask.

I also think the Goblin is a better villain than the Lizard from the re-boot. When Rhys Ifans is portraying Dr. Connors, it’s all good, but once he becomes the Lizard, I feel like we’re totally in Tokyo movie-monster land. I almost expect the characters to start talking in Japanese, with English sub-titles! The Lizard is powerful, but he doesn’t project EVIL to the same extent that the Goblin does. The split-personality motif, with the Goblin taunting Osborn in the vast loneliness of his palatial home is, in my mind, truly creepy.

I read in Wikipedia that comics journalist and historian Mike Conroy has noted that “Of all the costumed villains who’ve plagued Spider-Man over the years, the most flat-out unhinged and terrifying of them all is the Green Goblin.” Yes! That’s it! Unhinged. Works for me.

It also takes no stretch of the imagination to believe Cliff Robertson as Uncle Ben and Rosemary Harris as Aunt May. Russ has often commented that it doesn’t make sense that a teenage boy would have an octogenarian aunt and uncle, and I agree. However, this quibble is with Stan and Larry, not director Sam Raimi. I respect his decision to stick to canon and portray Aunt May and Uncle Ben exactly as they appear in the original comics. With that in mind, the actors are simply perfect in the roles.

Now, I have only read a few Spider-Man comics so far, and I have not yet met Mary Jane or Gwen, so I can’t comment on which actress does a better job with their role (Kirsten Dunst as Mary Jane, or Emma Stone as Gwen). However, I can say I love the hard-edged yet vulnerable demeanor of Mary Jane’s character. I also love her red, red hair!

My favorite bit of casting however is J.K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson. What a hoot! He pulls his performance not only from the Jameson character in the comics, but also from every newspaper editor we’ve ever seen in film or TV. Yeah, okay: predictable, stereotypical…but oh, so amusing! In my book, dead-on fun and fantastic!

THE CLASSIC ORIGIN STORY
But of course, in addition to great casting, the origin story is such a classic, it tells itself. I’m a big fan of canon, and they really stick with it here; they just speed it up a bit, so we get all the best elements of 40 years of canon in about two hours.

In the comics, it seems we have to wait half of forever for Peter to actually meet Mary Jane, or have any kind of romantic life at all. Now, she’s the girl next door. I also like seeing socially inept Peter have a friend in Harry Osborn (James Franco, a fantastic actor who doesn’t have a whole lot to work with here, but is a pleasure to gander upon). I haven’t read far enough yet in the comics to meet either of these characters, but their inclusion helps round out Peter as a three-dimensional character.

I also like how the film combines the elements of canon in a way that is actually better than the original. For instance, it makes so much sense that as a result of the infamous spider bite, our hero shoots webs from his wrists and doesn’t have to mess around with gooey glue. First of all, of course, no glue could actually be THAT strong (no matter what Billy Mays told you). But more importantly…why not have spider webs shoot out of Peter’s wrists? The spider bite makes him super-strong, super-agile, able to scale buildings with his feet and hands. He has all the other attributes of a spider, why not webbing as well?

I wonder if in the 1960’s Stan and Jack were prudishly reluctant to have their superhero biologically shoot a sticky substance from his body? Or maybe Elmer’s Glue had an advertising contract with Marvel Comics, and there were high hopes that little boys would rush down to the five-and-dime to buy glue or paste in an attempt to emulate their favorite teenaged superhero? Personally, I’m going with the Elmer’s sponsorship theory. I mean…how else can you account for Paste-Pot Pete?

THE END
But now I’m really getting off-track. One more thing I feel compelled to say: This version of Spider-Man is one of those rare movies where I enjoyed the film all the way through, but then I’m utterly disappointed in the ending. When I first saw this movie ten years ago, the ending baffled and annoyed me. I had not yet been exposed to enough superhero mythology to understand that the superhero must selflessly do everything he can to protect the people he loves, even if it means giving up the dreams he holds most dear. I had not yet heard the saying “With great power, comes great responsibility.” Now, even with my ever-so-slight background in Marvel comics, I understand that Peter, from a position of love, must reject Mary Jane in his desire to keep her safe.

But still, I’m confused. Who is it that has to avoid letting villains know his Achilles Heel? Spidey…or Peter? Obviously Spider-Man cannot have close personal relationships…but why can’t Peter? At the end of this movie, the only person who discovered Peter’s secret identity is now dead. So where’s the problem? What villain is going to come after those most beloved by nerdy Peter Parker? I mean, really…who cares?

But I guess Peter’s preparing for the day when Spider-Man’s true identity may once again be accidentally revealed. So, he’s acting in the present moment against something that might happen in the future, being extremely cautious, conscientious, and (dare I say it?) RESPONSIBLE.

Well, I guess that’s how we like our Spider-Man. But maybe more importantly, from a storytelling point of view, the selfless, lonely path of the hero creates a tremendous amount of pathos and drama.

At least until we get to the next Spider-Man movie, when Mary Jane discovers Peter’s secret identity. Of course at that point there’ll be new issues to deal with. But one thing at a time! With this first Spider-Man movie, we’ve had a good origin story (one that, in my opinion, did not need to be retold). More importantly, though, the critical and financial success of this movie, coming close on the heels of 2000’s sensational X-Men, continued to hold open the floodgates for all the other Marvel superheroes to burst through and demand their time on the silver screen.

As Peter Parker finds renewed self-confidence in his Spider-Man persona, Marvel Entertainment continues to be awakened and revived, so that it can grow into the entertainment giant that will eventually give us epics like the recent Thor, Iron Man and Avengers.

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Meanwhile… : January, 1963

Here are the other “Marvel Universe” books published in January, 1963:

Posted in Ant-Man, Meanwhile, Tales to Astonish | Leave a comment